Page 33 - revista agaca 161_web

33

caderno técnico

Cortés A., Feijoo G., Fernández M., Moreira M.T. (2020): Pursuing McGeough E.J., Little S.M., Janzen H.H., McAllister T.A., McGinn
the route to eco-efficiency in dairy production: the case S.M., Beauchemin K.A. (2012): Life-cycle assessment
of Galician area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285. of greenhouse gas emissions from dairy production
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124861
in Eastern Canada: A case study. Journal of Dairy
De Vries M., De Boers I.J.M. (2010): Comparing environmen- Science 95 (9): 5164-5175 https://doi.org/10.3168/
tal impacts for livestock products: A review of life cy- jds.2011-5229
cle assessments. Livestock Science, 128 (1-3): 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 Montero G, Ruiz-Peinado R, Muñoz M. (2005): Producción de
biomasa y fijación de CO por los bosques espa-
Del Prado A., Mas K., Pardo G., Gallejones P. (2013): Modelling 2
the interactions between C and N farm balances ñoles. Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia. Instituto
and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y
northern Spain. Science of the Total Environment 465 Alimentaria.
https:doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.064
Mosquera R., Santiago J.J., Ferreiro N., Rodríguez F.J. y Rigueiro
Denier Van Der Gon H., Bleeker A. (2005). Indirect N O emis-
2 A. (2019): A fertilización nas prácticas agroforestais.
sion due to atmospheric N deposition for the Nether-
lands. Atmospheric Environment, 39(32), 5827–5838. Revista Cooperación Galega, 142: 20-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.06.019
Mosquera R., Santiago J.J., Silva P., Ferreiro N., Álvarez-López
Espada, JL. (2013): Los árboles frutales como sumideros de V., Rodríguez F.J. y Rigueiro A. (2021): Informe sobre
CO2 desempeñan un importante servicio ambien- el análisis de secuestro de carbono a través de em-
tal. Informe Técnico nº 248. Departamento de Agri- pleo de metodología agroforestal. Silvoplast-USC.
cultura, Ganadería y Medio Ambiente del Gobierno
de Aragón Naranjo A., Johnson A., Rossow H., and Kebreab E. (2020):
Greenhouse gas, water, and land footprint per unit
European Commission. (2019): The European Green Deal.
COM (2019/640). Communication from the com- of production of the California dairy industry over 50
mission to the European Parliament, the European years. Journal of Dairy Science 103 (4):3760–3773ht-
Council, the Council, the European Economic and tps://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16576
Social Committee and the Committee of the Re-
gions. Rial M., Martinez-Cortizas A., Rodríguez-Lado L. (2017): Un-
derstanding the spatial distribution of factors contro-
García C., y Hernández T. (2018): Fertilizantes/enmiendas or-
gánicas basadas en residuos orgánicos: su futuro lling topsoil organic carbon content in European soi-
en una agricultura sostenible. CEBAS-CSIC. ls. Science of the Total Environment 609, 1411–1422.
Hoekstra A.Y., Mekonnen, M.M. (2012). The water footprint of http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.012
humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 109(9), 3232-3237 https://www.pnas.org/ Salcedo G., Baez MªD., García I., Castro J., Santiago C.,
doi/epdf/10.1073/pnas.1109936109 (2019): Emisiones y huella de carbono en las explo-
taciones lecheras de Galicia. Vaca Pinta 14: 150-161.
Iribarren D., Hospido A., Moreira M.T., Feijoo G. (2011): Ben-
chmarking environmental and operational pa- Sarker A, Kashem A., Osman K.T., Hossain I, Ahmed F., (2014):
rameters through eco-efficiency criteria for dairy Evaluation of available P by soil test methods in an
farms. Science of the Total Environment, 409. acidic soil incubated with different levels of lime
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.013
and phosphorus. Open Journal of Soil Science 4:
Fernández, M. (2012): Eficiencia enerxética nas explotacións 103-108 https://file.scirp.org/pdf/OJSS_2014.40314
de leite. Rev Afriga (101), 61-71
Soussana J.F., Tallec T., Blanfort V. (2010): Mitigating the green-
IPCC. (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for house gas balance of ruminant production sys-
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Task Force on
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. https://www. tems through carbon sequestration in grasslands.
ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp Animal 4 (3): 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1751731109990784
Jacobs, J.A., Siegford, J.M. (2012). Invited review: The impact
of automatic milking systems on dairy cow manage- Todde G, Murgia L, Caria M, Pazzona A, (2018). A comprehen-
ment, behavior, health, and welfare. Journal of Dairy sive energy analysis and related carbon footprint
Science, 95(5), 2227–2247. https://doi.org/10.3168/ of dairy farms, part 1: Direct energy requirements.
jds.2011-4943
Energies 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/
Macías F., Calvo de Anta R., Rodríguez Lado L., Verde R., Pena en11020451
Pérez X., Camps Arbestain M. (2004): El sumidero de
carbono de los suelos de Galicia. Edafología 11 (3), United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030
341-376. Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/RES/70/1:
Marques J.G.O., de Oliveira Silva R., Barioni L.G., Hall J.A.J, Fos- Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25
saert C., Tedeschie L.O., Garcia-Launa F., Morana D. September 2015.
(2022): Evaluating environmental and economic tra-
de-offs in cattle feed strategies using multiobjective https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/
optimization. Agricultural Systems, 195. https://doi. documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustai-
org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103308 nable%20Development%20web.pdf

Nº 161 Decembro 2022